Compare the2025 Subaru OutbackVS 2024 Dodge Hornet

For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Subaru Outback have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Dodge Hornet doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.

In the past twenty years hundreds of infants and young children have died after being left in vehicles, usually by accident. When turning the vehicle off, drivers of the Outback are reminded to check the back seat if they opened the rear door before starting out. The Hornet doesn’t offer a back seat reminder.

Both the Outback and the Hornet have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

The Subaru Outback achieved a “Top Safety Pick” rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) for the 2024 model year. This recognition was based on its impressive performance in the small overlap frontal crash test, updated side impact crash test, headlight evaluations, and pedestrian crash prevention testing. The Hornet has not yet been evaluated by the IIHS for 2024.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2024 Auto Issue reports that Subaru vehicles are more reliable than Dodge vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Subaru 15 places higher in reliability than Dodge.

As tested in Motor Trend the Outback XT/Wilderness 2.4 turbo 4-cylinder is faster than the Hornet GT 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder:

The flat cylinder configuration of the boxer engine in the Outback lowers its center of gravity, enhancing handling stability (That’s why Porsche uses boxer engines.). The Hornet doesn’t offer a boxer engine configuration.

On the EPA test cycle the Outback gets better mileage than the Hornet running its gasoline engine:

The Outback has 7.3 gallons more fuel capacity than the Hornet R/T’s standard fuel tank (18.5 vs. 11.2 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups. The Outback has 5 gallons more fuel capacity than the Hornet GT’s standard fuel tank (18.5 vs. 13.5 gallons).

The Outback has a standard continuously variable transmission (CVT). With no “steps” between gears, it can keep the engine at the most efficient speed for fuel economy, or keep it at its peak horsepower indefinitely for maximum acceleration. The Hornet doesn’t offer a CVT.

For better stopping power the Outback’s standard brake rotors are larger than those on the Hornet:

The Outback’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Hornet are solid, not vented.

For better traction, the Outback has larger tires than the Hornet (225/65R17 vs. 215/60R17).

The Outback Wilderness/Onyx XT has a standard full size spare tire so a flat doesn’t interrupt your trip. A full size spare isn’t available on the Hornet; it requires you to depend on a temporary spare, which has mileage and speed limitations, or roadside assistance and a tow-truck.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Outback’s wheelbase is 4.3 inches longer than on the Hornet (108.1 inches vs. 103.8 inches).

The Outback Limited handles at .79 G’s, while the Hornet GT pulls only .78 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The Outback Wilderness executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the Hornet GT (27.2 seconds @ .63 average G’s vs. 27.6 seconds @ .62 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Outback’s turning circle is 1.8 feet tighter than the Hornet R/T’s (36.1 feet vs. 37.9 feet). The Outback’s turning circle is 1.9 feet tighter than the Hornet GT’s (36.1 feet vs. 38 feet).

For greater off-road capability the Outback has a 2.6 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the Hornet R/T (8.7 vs. 6.1 inches), allowing the Outback to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Outback Wilderness’ minimum ground clearance is 1.4 inches higher than on the Hornet GT (9.5 vs. 8.1 inches).

The front grille of the Outback 2.5i uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The Hornet doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

The Outback has 11 cubic feet more passenger volume than the Hornet (109 vs. 98).

The Outback has 1.3 inches more front headroom, 1.1 inches more front legroom, 1.2 inches more front hip room, 2.4 inches more front shoulder room, .9 inches more rear headroom, 1.5 inches more rear legroom, 1.3 inches more rear hip room and 2.6 inches more rear shoulder room than the Hornet.

For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Outback’s rear seats recline. The Hornet’s rear seats don’t recline.

The front step up height for the Outback is .8 inches lower than the Hornet (19” vs. 19.8”). The Outback’s rear step up height is 1.2 inches lower than the Hornet’s (18.5” vs. 19.7”).

The Outback has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the Hornet with its rear seat up (32.6 vs. 27 cubic feet). The Outback has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the Hornet with its rear seat folded (75.6 vs. 54.7 cubic feet).

A low lift-over trunk design makes loading and unloading the Outback easier. The Outback’s trunk lift-over height is 28.4 inches, while the Hornet’s liftover is 31.8 inches.

The Outback’s cargo area is larger than the Hornet’s in every dimension:

A standard locking glovebox (which can’t be accessed with the valet key) keeps your small valuables safer in the Outback. The Hornet doesn’t offer locking storage for small valuables.

The Outback’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the Hornet’s (2700 vs. 2000 pounds). Maximum trailer towing in the Dodge Hornet is only 2000 pounds. The Outback offers up to a 3500 lbs. towing capacity.

The engine in the Outback is mounted longitudinally (North-South), instead of sideways, as in the Hornet. This makes it easier to service and maintain, because the accessory belts are in front.

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Outback’s available exterior PIN entry system (not available on Outback Base). The Hornet doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system.

To improve rear visibility by keeping the rear window clear, the Outback has a standard rear fixed intermittent wiper with a full on position. The rear wiper standard on the Hornet only has an intermittent setting, so in a hard rain visibility isn’t as good.

The Hornet’s optional cornering lamps activate a lamp on the front corner when the turn signal is activated. The Outback’s standard adaptive cornering lights turn the actual headlight unit up to several degrees, depending on steering wheel angle and vehicle speed. This lights a significant distance into corners at any speed.

Manual rear side window sunshades are available in the Outback to help block heat and glare for the rear passengers. The Hornet doesn’t offer rear side window sunshades.

When the Outback Limited/Touring is put in reverse, both rearview mirrors tilt from their original position. This gives the driver a better view of the curb during parallel parking maneuvers. Shifting out of reverse puts the mirrors into their original positions. The Hornet’s mirrors don’t automatically adjust for backing.

The Outback’s optional rear and side view mirrors have an automatic dimming feature. These mirrors can be set to automatically darken quickly when headlights shine on them, keeping following vehicles from blinding or distracting the driver. The Hornet offers an automatic rear view mirror, but its side mirrors don’t dim.

Both the Outback and the Hornet offer available heated front seats. The Outback Limited/Touring/Onyx XT/Wilderness also has standard heated rear seats to keep those passengers extremely comfortable in the winter. Heated rear seats aren’t available in the Hornet.

Insurance will cost less for the Outback owner. The Complete Car Cost Guide estimates that insurance for the Outback will cost $555 to $1910 less than the Hornet over a five-year period.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Subaru Outback, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Dodge Hornet isn't recommended.

The Subaru Outback outsold the Dodge Hornet by over 17 to one during 2023.